And THAT is the reason why Playboy is losing sales. Nameless naked bimbos are a dime-a-dozen (and free) on the Net so why bother seeing all those plastic Barbie Playmates they feature? And since they aren't worth the cover price, then the only way Playboy can grab attention is to feature naked celebs. Problem is, the so-called "celebs" they give us are nothing but has-beens we've seen naked over and over (Brook, Pam Anderson, etc.) or never-will-be reality stars we've never heard of or could care less about. You want to start raking on the sales, Hef? Then start grabbing some hot A-list actresses or the popular young actresses on screen these days (that we've actually heard of). But you never will because A-list actresses feel it's beneath them to pose nude (i.e. actually showing nips or butt) for a mag like PB even though some are stark naked on screen. And most of the younger actresses are too scared to show any skin on screen or in pics. So all you (and we) are left with are non-entities desperate for attention. And even some of them won't even pose nude in a NUDE mag. The recent debacle where G4 host Olivia Munn posed but didn't show anything was an absolute insult to men and the rare few PB readers left. The fact that PB let her get away with that "F-You" to us guys is just more proof that that mag deserves to fade away. And so does Hef.

It's so easy to write off Hugh as nothing more than an old perv. Granted he IS an old perv, lol, but there's much more to this guy that doesn't get noticed or praised like it should...

Here's 4 things about Hefner that I didn't know:

http://www.digitallizardproductions.com/daily-fournication-08.06.10--4-reasons-why-hugh-hefner-rules.html